forbes

Nvidia Has Been Quite Relevant To Stocks, Which Means the Fed Can’t Be

Last Tuesday Nvidia shed over $279 billion in value. It was the biggest one-day paper loss for a corporation in the history of the stock market. As a CNN report put it, “only 27 companies on the planet are worth as much as Nvidia lost in value on Tuesday.”

To which someone, somewhere will ponder how the catalyst (Nvidia) of the most recent stock-market run-up could have plunged so substantially. After all, the Federal Reserve is poised to reduce interest rates and, well, you know, equity markets are said to be led by the Fed. It’s said that stocks go up when the Fed is reducing rates, and down when the Fed is increasing them.

It’s a popular narrative that’s contradicted by the narrative; one that ignores the obvious about markets being populated by buyers and sellers. The Fed narrative presumes a market comprised solely of buyers. How else to explain the monstrous information asymmetry that would have to exist whereby uninformed sellers routinely sell shares to more informed buyers who are buying because they uniquely know the implications of the Fed cutting rates.

Read the full article at Forbes

Author

  • John Tamny

    John Tamny is Founder and President of the Parkview Institute, editor of RealClearMarkets, senior fellow at the Market Institute, and Senior Economic Adviser to mutual fund firm Applied Finance Group. Tamny is the author of eight books. His latest is The Deficit Delusion: Why Everything Left, Right and Supply-Side Tell You About the National Debt Is Wrong. His others are Bringing Adam Smith Into the American Home: A Case Against Home Ownership, The Money Confusion, When Politicians Panicked: The New Coronavirus, Expert Opinion, and a Tragic Lapse of Reason, Popular Economics, Who Needs the Fed?, The End of Work, and They're Both Wrong: A Policy Guide for America's Frustrated Independent Thinkers.

    View all posts
Scroll to Top