banking

forbes

The Fed’s So-Called ‘Inflation Fight’ Was a Big, Fat Non Sequitur

The inflation fight was a non sequitur, not to mention that the higher prices had nothing to do with inflation. The wonder is if the various economic religions will ever accept that the fastest path to lower prices isn’t Fed rate fiddling, rather it’s spreading production across as many hands and machines as possible.

The Fed’s So-Called ‘Inflation Fight’ Was a Big, Fat Non Sequitur Read More »

forbes

The Dangerous Pointlessness of Bank Capital Requirements

Banks, like any business, never run out of money. They run out of investor trust. That’s why the only capital requirement for banks should be no capital requirement. They only succeed insofar as they force banks to sideline funds they’ve rented, and at a cost. To then pretend that any cushion would be sufficient if a bank ran into serious trouble is just silly.

The Dangerous Pointlessness of Bank Capital Requirements Read More »

Mark-to-Market is Not as Simple For Banks as is Assumed

Cato Institute co-founder Ed Crane and I have been discussing mark-to-market accounting for banks in the aftermath of SVB’s troubles. Crane is not seeking force on the matter, but does think mark-to-market would render bank balance sheets credible where they’re presently not. My response is that regardless of what banks do, investors strive to mark to market.

Mark-to-Market is Not as Simple For Banks as is Assumed Read More »

Scroll to Top